<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Eddie Schneider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eddieschneider.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eddieschneider.com</link>
	<description>Literary agent, ultrarunner, sporadic blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Narrative development by Chris Lites</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2008/11/22/narrative-development/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Lites]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree on updating this. As a writer with a background in philosophy it&#039;s welcome to see an agent looking for ideas as a secondary substrate to the horizontal narrative propulsion. I&#039;ll look forward to querying you soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on updating this. As a writer with a background in philosophy it&#8217;s welcome to see an agent looking for ideas as a secondary substrate to the horizontal narrative propulsion. I&#8217;ll look forward to querying you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats by Trevor Boylan</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2012/09/14/some-stats/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor Boylan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.com/?p=173#comment-328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the statistics in your post to be both informative and useful.  I&#039;m beginning to wish that all agents would have a similar resource posted to help authors determine 1) how &quot;actively&quot; they&#039;re actually seeking to represent new authors and 2) how interested they actually are in a particular subject/genre/viewpoint/etc.  Thanks again for putting the time in to track it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the statistics in your post to be both informative and useful.  I&#8217;m beginning to wish that all agents would have a similar resource posted to help authors determine 1) how &#8220;actively&#8221; they&#8217;re actually seeking to represent new authors and 2) how interested they actually are in a particular subject/genre/viewpoint/etc.  Thanks again for putting the time in to track it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats by Signed &#124; Secret.</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2012/09/14/some-stats/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Signed &#124; Secret.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.com/?p=173#comment-325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] strangely, getting an agent was more difficult than getting a book accepted. (look at Eddie&#8217;s acceptance stats) I had agents make polite overtones, but otherwise indicate that while they liked my writing, they [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strangely, getting an agent was more difficult than getting a book accepted. (look at Eddie&#8217;s acceptance stats) I had agents make polite overtones, but otherwise indicate that while they liked my writing, they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2012/09/14/some-stats/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.com/?p=173#comment-309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, just to point out that the 2/5 and the 53:47 split are not so far off 50:50 to represent any statistically significant deviation from random, so I think you can safely consider yourself nonbiased in the gender department.
Also, incredibly impressive that you&#039;d bother to check in the first place. Which means, I think, that you are considerably biased about being nonbiased, which, to be biased, is IMO fantastic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, just to point out that the 2/5 and the 53:47 split are not so far off 50:50 to represent any statistically significant deviation from random, so I think you can safely consider yourself nonbiased in the gender department.<br />
Also, incredibly impressive that you&#8217;d bother to check in the first place. Which means, I think, that you are considerably biased about being nonbiased, which, to be biased, is IMO fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some stats by nicholegiles</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2012/09/14/some-stats/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicholegiles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.com/?p=173#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You make me smile, Eddie! Good luck with your goals to diversify. That&#039;s an awesome plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make me smile, Eddie! Good luck with your goals to diversify. That&#8217;s an awesome plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It was a queer, sultry summer by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2011/07/22/it-was-a-queer-sultry-summer/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.com/?p=154#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Eddie, I bet you just use the name awful agent just to scare away hack writers like me....well it worked! Lol But I do have a serious question, out of curiosity do you find the writing coming from the anz, sa and uk to be of better quality than the domestic stuff? Or are the slush piles equally high?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eddie, I bet you just use the name awful agent just to scare away hack writers like me&#8230;.well it worked! Lol But I do have a serious question, out of curiosity do you find the writing coming from the anz, sa and uk to be of better quality than the domestic stuff? Or are the slush piles equally high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Narrative development by Noah</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2008/11/22/narrative-development/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a really interesting post (I realize it&#039;s old, but I only just found it). My one problem with it is that it seems to me that you could have all of the above-mentioned qualities, and still no masterpiece. At the risk of joining you in the ivory tower, perhaps you need to not only have all four CASE qualities, but also have at least one of these qualities be truly superlative. To use an example from your favorite-author list, Kurt Vonnegut&#039;s BREAKFAST OF CHAMPIONS certainly has a plot and central conflict (Storytelling), but its main strength is what you would call Articulation. I prefer it to CAT&#039;S CRADLE, which again has all four elements, but is stronger on both Creativity and Engagement. (BOC *feels* plenty creative, but when you think about it, how creative is a science-fiction author writing about another science-fiction author?) So I&#039;m just not convinced that the CASE Hierarchy is in fact a hierarchy. 

All that having been said, I like your theory of narrative, and it does reflect my experience in terms of writing. When I first started writing my novel (the first three chapters of which may already be sitting on your desk!) I did not expect it to have any significant amount of Engagement. I started writing it in college, and my professors kept telling me that they wanted to see something that dealt with Big Issues--a novel that was more Jewish, or more philosophical, or, it seemed to me, less commercial. I was very resistant to the idea, because I thought they were asking for a polemic and I just wanted to write fantasy. But the more I wrote, the more my novel started to engage with the real world, from religion to love--accidentally! That was a major part of my growth as a writer: becoming engaged (with or without a capital E).

Okay, enough late-night/early-morning commentary on two-year-old blog posts. Good morning, and don&#039;t forget to read my MS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting post (I realize it&#8217;s old, but I only just found it). My one problem with it is that it seems to me that you could have all of the above-mentioned qualities, and still no masterpiece. At the risk of joining you in the ivory tower, perhaps you need to not only have all four CASE qualities, but also have at least one of these qualities be truly superlative. To use an example from your favorite-author list, Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s BREAKFAST OF CHAMPIONS certainly has a plot and central conflict (Storytelling), but its main strength is what you would call Articulation. I prefer it to CAT&#8217;S CRADLE, which again has all four elements, but is stronger on both Creativity and Engagement. (BOC *feels* plenty creative, but when you think about it, how creative is a science-fiction author writing about another science-fiction author?) So I&#8217;m just not convinced that the CASE Hierarchy is in fact a hierarchy. </p>
<p>All that having been said, I like your theory of narrative, and it does reflect my experience in terms of writing. When I first started writing my novel (the first three chapters of which may already be sitting on your desk!) I did not expect it to have any significant amount of Engagement. I started writing it in college, and my professors kept telling me that they wanted to see something that dealt with Big Issues&#8211;a novel that was more Jewish, or more philosophical, or, it seemed to me, less commercial. I was very resistant to the idea, because I thought they were asking for a polemic and I just wanted to write fantasy. But the more I wrote, the more my novel started to engage with the real world, from religion to love&#8211;accidentally! That was a major part of my growth as a writer: becoming engaged (with or without a capital E).</p>
<p>Okay, enough late-night/early-morning commentary on two-year-old blog posts. Good morning, and don&#8217;t forget to read my MS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FAQ by tony vitale</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/about/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tony vitale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eddie, nice to meet you on Monday.  I came across your site from your LInkedIn profile.  Woody Allen?  The?  Anyway, to give you an idea of how a blog can get out of hand, try mine.  It was very elaborate around 2002-2003, so click on a month from the pulldown menus on the homepage.  A couple of years ago, I actually stopped, and then have been reforming it recently, but it&#039;s just diary notes now.  You&#039;ll see what I mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eddie, nice to meet you on Monday.  I came across your site from your LInkedIn profile.  Woody Allen?  The?  Anyway, to give you an idea of how a blog can get out of hand, try mine.  It was very elaborate around 2002-2003, so click on a month from the pulldown menus on the homepage.  A couple of years ago, I actually stopped, and then have been reforming it recently, but it&#8217;s just diary notes now.  You&#8217;ll see what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Awesome street sign by Chloe</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2008/09/02/awesome-street-sign/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chloe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, too funny.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, too funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Narrative development by Chloe</title>
		<link>http://eddieschneider.com/2008/11/22/narrative-development/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chloe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eddieschneider.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I really like your layout.  It&#039;s neat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I really like your layout.  It&#8217;s neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>